Congress and state legislatures have not approved the practice, which has also been employed by the Federal Bureau of Investigations agents. The use of facial recognition technology has come under criticism from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers, who have raised concerns about the threat it poses to civil liberties. Employers, educators, and governments are letting them down. People want to keep up in the artificial intelligence age. “That’s actually a really hopeful sign that there’s going to be more of a pushback, because we’re way behind the curve when it comes to regulating how data is used, and how algorithms are used.”

“I think people are starting to be more aware of what the issues are and how this information can be used,” she says.

respondents expressed concern about their personal information being at risk when using products or services that employ artificial intelligence. You already have the case of over-policing of minority communities, so this is going to exacerbate that.”Ī new global survey conducted by Northeastern University and Gallup revealed that 70 percent of U.S. “They’re more inaccurate when it comes to women and minorities, so you’re going to get way more false-positive matches. “There’s the issue of how accurate are these systems, and it looks like there’s good reason to think they’re not very accurate,” she says. Stricter oversight of the software development process could help to reduce inaccuracies, she says. Photo by Matthew Modoono/Northeastern UniversityĪrtificial intelligence can be prone to errors, she says, and therefore result in higher rates of misidentification and false arrests. Kay Mathiesen, an associate professor of philosophy and religion at Northeastern who researches computer ethics and justice, has expressed concerns about the way that federal investigators are using facial recognition technology.

Driver license recognition